Skip to content

You select people. You do not sell seats.

Universities, research institutes, accelerators and foundations run rounds that are genuinely competitive, then teach for months and issue something that gets checked. A checkout button is the wrong shape for all three parts.

Formats you’d run
Application-basedBootcamp / fellowship
AdmissionsSample interface
The review pipeline. Every applicant sits in a state you can filter and act on, reviewers leave notes the applicant never sees, and a bulk decision still sends each person their own email. Illustrative, with sample data.

None of this is a tooling problem until it is.

Every one of these works fine at small scale. They tend to fail in the same week.

Applications arriving as email attachments named final_v2.pdf
A review committee working from a shared document
No record of why someone was declined last cycle
Accepted candidates who go quiet before the tuition lands
Months of submitted work tracked in a folder nobody trusts
01

Applications built for real scrutiny

Multi-step forms with document uploads, eligibility questions, and answers that stay attached to the applicant through every round of review.

AdmissionsSample interface
The review pipeline. Every applicant sits in a state you can filter and act on, reviewers leave notes the applicant never sees, and a bulk decision still sends each person their own email. Illustrative, with sample data.
02

A committee that leaves a trail

Shortlist, discuss in private notes, and record the decision against whoever made it. Next cycle, you can see exactly what happened to a returning applicant.

AdmissionsSample interface
The review pipeline. Every applicant sits in a state you can filter and act on, reviewers leave notes the applicant never sees, and a bulk decision still sends each person their own email. Illustrative, with sample data.
03

Months of coursework, then a credential worth the name

Assignments and quizzes across a long program, and a credential with a public page, a permanent ID and revocation — because a fellowship certificate gets checked.

VerificationSample interface
The public page anyone can open to check a credential. The render is frozen at the moment of issue, so editing next year's template cannot change a certificate already in someone's hands — and a revocation fails verification everywhere, immediately. Illustrative, with sample data.
Every round
On the record, cycle to cycle
Private
Reviewer notes, never shown
Verifiable
Every credential issued

Selective, long-running programs are where the span matters most: the admissions round, the months of coursework and the credential are one record here rather than three systems.

Bring one real program. Leave with a clear plan.

In thirty minutes, we will map how your current program moves from its public page to enrollment, tuition, teaching, and the final certificate—and tell you plainly where Certrevo fits.